What's the difference between "general" and "generic"?
Apr 30, 2014 · Generic is the opposite of specific. Generic and specific refer to the identification of a fact. Specific means a fact that has been specified. If you ask for (specify) a pain reliever, …
C# Generics and Type Checking - Stack Overflow
In case you happen to have a generic method that returns a generic value but doesn't have generic parameters, you can use default(T) + (T)(object) cast, together with C# 8 pattern …
How can I pass in a func with a generic type parameter?
Mar 24, 2014 · You can certainly define generic delegates, after all, that's exactly what Func and Action are. They are treated as generic definitions, just like generic interfaces and classes are. …
How do you provide a default type for generics? - Stack Overflow
Jul 8, 2009 · The generic parameter type will be the same for all methods, so I would like it at the class level. I know I could make a generic version and then inherit from it for the int version, …
Creating a generic method in C# - Stack Overflow
Jan 27, 2010 · I am trying to combine a bunch of similar methods into a generic method. I have several methods that return the value of a querystring, or null if that querystring does not exist …
c# - How to compare values of generic types? - Stack Overflow
What keeps us from comparing the values of generic types which are known to be IComparable? Doesn't it somehow defeat the entire purpose of generic constraints?
How to define generic type limit to primitive types?
Apr 30, 2009 · I have the following method with generic type: T GetValue<T> (); I would like to limit T to primitive types such as int, string, float but not class type. I know I can define generic …
c# - Collection of generic types - Stack Overflow
Nov 4, 2012 · 43 Have your generic class inherit from a non-generic base, or implement a non-generic interface. Then you can have a collection of this type and cast within whatever code …
Can I make a generic optional, defaulting to a certain class?
Dec 5, 2012 · My question is related to Is there a reasonable approach to "default" type parameters in C# Generics?, but using an inner generic class that approach doesn't work. …
Using a 'using alias = class' with generic types? [duplicate]
using LookupDictionary = System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary<string, int>; Now I want to accomplish the same with a generic type, while preserving it as a generic type: